HotWhy WriteStudent PrivacyHonest AccountsPublic VoiceKeeping A RecordWriting Habits
Latest If you would not show the post to the student, do not publish the post.
Starting Out

The Post You Write Is The Thinking You Did Not Know You Had

Most teachers know more about their practice than they can say out loud. Writing it down in public is the fastest way to find out what you actually think, and the cheapest way to leave yourself a record you can return to.

There is a gap between doing a job well and being able to describe how you do it. Teachers and trainers live in that gap constantly. You make forty small decisions in a lesson, most of them by feel, and if someone asks afterwards why you changed the grouping halfway through you may find you have no answer beyond a shrug. The knowledge is real. It is simply held in a form that has never been asked to become language. Writing about your practice in public forces the translation. You sit down intending to describe a straightforward thing you did on Tuesday and discover, three paragraphs in, that you cannot actually explain the reasoning, which means the reasoning was thinner than you assumed.

That discovery is uncomfortable and it is the entire point. A post is a test you set yourself. It does not matter whether anyone reads it. The work happens in the composing, in the moment where you delete a confident sentence because you notice you cannot support it. Teachers who write regularly tend to report the same thing: they became better at explaining their choices to colleagues, to managers, to students, not because they learned new vocabulary but because they had already done the explaining once, alone, at a keyboard, with nobody watching and nothing at stake. The public part matters only in that it raises the standard slightly. You write a little more carefully when the thing might be read.

Continue reading

Why Write At All

A Record You Can Return To In Three Years

Memory rewrites the difficult parts out of the story; a written account does not.

The Modest, Real Value Of Describing What You Tried

You are not reforming anything, and a plain account is still worth writing.

Writing About Students Without Exposing Them

Composite Detail And Why Alteration Is Not Enough

Changing the name is the easiest step and the least protective one.

Small Cohorts Make Anonymising Harder Than It Looks

In a group of twelve, almost any distinguishing feature is effectively a name.

The Test That Settles Most Cases Quickly

If you would not show the post to the student, do not publish the post.

Honest Writing About Practice

The Account Of Something That Did Not Work

It is the more useful post and the more rarely written one, for obvious reasons.

Specific Enough To Be Checked, Modest Enough To Be True

Say what you did in detail; say what it means without inflating it.

The Public Part

Describing Your Practice Versus Criticising Your Workplace

The line is not always obvious from the inside, and it is worth locating deliberately.

Disagreement In Public, Conducted Well

Argue with the position, describe your own practice, and let the reader weigh it.

Anything Published Is Permanent And Findable

Deletion removes the page, not the copies, the caches or the memory of it.

About Ed Blog

Ed Blog is about one narrow thing: teachers and trainers writing publicly about their own practice. Not research, not scholarship, not peer review, but the informal account a practitioner writes because they want to work out what they think and leave themselves a record. That kind of writing is easy to start and surprisingly easy to get wrong, mostly in ways that are invisible to the person writing and obvious to everybody else. What is collected here is a set of disciplines rather than a method: how to describe your own work accurately, how to keep the people in the room out of the public record, and how to hold your claims to the size of the thing you actually did.

The emphasis throughout is on restraint, because restraint is where this kind of writing succeeds or fails. The pull is always toward the vivid detail, the flattering account and the general claim, and all three make a post worse and two of them can do real harm. Writing about your own decisions rather than about identifiable people costs you the most colourful material and gains you a piece you will not regret in five years. Describing something that did not work is harder than describing a success and is worth more to the person reading. None of this is complicated. It is simply easier to describe than to do at the end of a long term.

Nothing here is legal advice, and none of it should be read as a substitute for the obligations and policies that apply where you work. Requirements around privacy, public comment by employees and use of material differ between employers, sectors and jurisdictions, they change, and the only sensible course is to find out what governs your own situation before you publish. What this publication offers is a way of thinking about the writing itself: proportionate claims, careful handling of other people, honest accounts of ordinary attempts, and the assumption that anything published is permanent, findable and read by people you did not have in mind.